Gay friendly bible

Jeremiah KaayaSupporterPastor at Springs of Power Church, Teacher by professionalHow we package homosexuality can never make it acceptable. It is an abomination like one sleeping with their parents, sleeping with beasts, and if we have accepted none of these, neither will we accept gay. Label you, it is not us to deny or accept, the standard has already been set by God, gay is not only a sin, it is an abomination. Whatever we are discussing here or there is our business, not God's. On that note therefore, I can't attend a queer affirming "church" because to be gay is already non-Christian, for that reason I would be attending something else not a Christian Church, at least not one Jesus the CHRIST died for. I thank God for His Son Jesus the CHRIST, had it not been Him, at the right hand of God the Father, pleading for us day and night, in the hope that we will transform, this nature would have already suffered the fate of of Sodom and Gomorrah. Jesus stands between us and God the Father, otherwise, His wrath would contain already finished us. Enable us stop bragging about sin, more so abominations like gay, because if we don't, soon people will begin to claim to freely practice inc

The Bible and equal sex relationships: A review article

Tim Keller, 2015

Vines, Matthew, God and the Homosexual Christian: The Biblical Case in Endorse of Same Sex Relationships, Convergent Books, 2014

Wilson, Ken,A Letter to My Congregation, David Crum Media, 2014.

The relationship of homosexuality to Christianity is one of the main topics of discussion in our culture today. In the descent of last year I wrote a review of books by Wesley Hill and Sam Allberry that take the historic Christian view, in Hill’s words: “that homosexuality was not God’s first creative intention for humanity ... and therefore that queer practice goes against God’s express will for all human beings, especially those who trust in Christ.”

There are a number of other books that take the reverse view, namely that the Bible either allows for or supports same sex relationships. Over the last year or so I (and other pastors at Redeemer) have been regularly asked for responses to their arguments. The two most read volumes taking this position seem to be those by Matthew Vines and Ken Wilson. The review of these two books will be longer than usual because the topic is so contested today and, wh

Channel72 wrote: Are you even trying any more?

You for sure aren't. Your confused rambling that isn't dealing with my point is boring. Fact is, Job shows wealth as a reward for faith. Deal with it.

Sigh... now I see you've resorted to outright lying/distortion. You blatantly ignored and then clipped out the part which clearly states my position: [SNIP]
It's not rocket-science, asshole. The extent to which Jesus endorses the Old Testament isn't clear, but it IS clear that he wouldn't accept of homosexual sex.

So you confess that when you said that Jesus pretty much endorsed everything in the Old Testamentyou were being full of hot air? I don't have to utter that this "clarification" of yours only came up after some prodding, right? Does that represent you retract your first announce on this thread? I long for so.
As for that "clarification", Jesus was being much harsher on adultery than the OT and forbade divorce outright when the OT allowed it. So once again, it's Jesus quite explicitly not following the OT tradition and yet you somehow employ this as proof that Jesus would agree with it on homosexuality nonetheless. That, my son, is called an utter non-sequitur. I was being kind by ig

What is the Queen James Bible?

Answer

The Queen James Bible (QJV), also called the “Gay Bible,” is an edit of the biblical communicate done in the name of preventing “homophobic interpretations.” To accomplish this purpose, the publishers printed a Bible in which all negative references to homosexualityhave been removed. The Queen James Bible was published in 2012 and is based on the 1769 edition of the King James Bible.

The publishers of the Queen James Bible chose the name “Queen James” as an apparent take-off on the “King James” Version, as the Authorized Version of 1611 is commonly called. The publishers of the Gay Bible also claim that King James was bisexual, so their choice of title capitalizes on the slang meaning of the term queen.

The editors of the Queen James Bible, who chose to be anonymous, claim that there was no reference to homosexuality in any Bible translation prior to the 1946 Revised Standard Version. Then, they assert, “anti-LGBT Bible interpretations” arose, based on a faulty translation in the RSV of eight verses.

The unidentified “scholars”—their scholastic credentials are unknown—who produced the Queen James Bible recommend that all Bible trans